Κυριακή 4 Αυγούστου 2019

Intensive Care Medicine August 2019, Volume 45, Issue 8, pp 1152–1153

Pulmonary complications in liver disease
Chronic liver disease and impaired hepatic function are important risk factors for increased incidence of, and mortality from, acute pulmonary complications including manifest acute respiratory distress syndrome in approximately 8% of cirrhotics admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) []. While micro-aspiration associated with encephalopathy and hydropic decompensation are well-known triggers for pulmonary complications [], the more specific consequences of end-stage liver disease on the pulmonary microcirculation, such as hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) and portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH), result from either production of or failure to clear a broad range of inflammatory, vasoactive or proliferative/angiogenic mediators []. The impact of an altered bile acid pattern induces a shift in the gut microbiome [] that sheds new light on the molecular basis of the long acknowledged ‘gut–liver–lung axis’ as the “motor of multiple organ failure”.

Two discrete entities affecting the pulmonary vascular bed—hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension

In addition to these acute organ–organ interactions, prolonged stimulation by liver-derived vasoactive and proliferative mediators promotes remodeling processes in the pulmonary vascular bed in chronic liver disease through diffuse or localized telangiectasia (in HPS) or hyperplastic lesions in terminal pulmonary arterioles (in PoPH) [].
Respiratory function needs to be assessed in all candidates listed or considered for liver transplantation (LT), as primary disorders affecting the pulmonary circulation are associated with functional status, quality of life, and survival on the waiting list and outcome after LT []. HPS and PoPH, a form of secondary pulmonary hypertension (PAH), might also prompt unplanned admission of the patient with end-stage liver disease with dyspnea or right heart dysfunction and require immediate and appropriate care on an ICU to prevent further deterioration of an already limited liver function.
Hepatopulmonary syndrome is characterized by hypoxemia with an abnormal alveolar–arterial O2-gradient and evidence of intrapulmonary shunting in the presence of liver disease []. Abnormal oxygenation is defined by elevated alveolar–arterial oxygen gradient (> 15 mmHg or > 20 mmHg in patients > 64 years, respectively) while breathing room air in a sitting position, and severity of HPS is classified according to the degree of hypoxemia []. The underlying intrapulmonary vascular dilatations can best be diagnosed by contrast-enhanced echocardiography, and characteristic findings on CT imaging may also be seen. In severe cases, clinical characteristics of hypoxemia such as cyanosis and digital clubbing might be present. The severity of HPS might be aggravated by upright posture (platypnea–orthodeoxia) and is not related to the severity of liver disease. In general, the pulmonary circulation is diffusely affected by telangiectatic lesions, but anatomically defined shunts might less commonly exist that are potentially amenable to interventional therapy (Fig. 1) [].
Fig. 1
Alterations of the pulmonary vascular bed in chronic liver disease: chronic liver disease promotes remodeling processes in the pulmonary vascular bed characterized by diffuse or localized telangiectasia (in HPS) or hyperplastic lesions in terminal pulmonary arterioles (PoPH). The diagnostic workup includes blood gases in the supine and upright posture and contrast-enhanced echocardiography. Evidence of secondary pulmonary hypertension or right-to-left shunting triggers further imaging. HPS and PoPH are associated with functional status, quality of life, and survival on the waiting list and outcome after LT with strong impact on listing for LT
Hepatopulmonary syndrome is present in 10–30% of patients with cirrhosis being evaluated for LT, but has also been reported in non-cirrhotic portal hypertension and acute liver injury in the critically ill, e.g., in patients after shock events presenting signs of “hypoxic hepatitis” []. As such, acute HPS as a consequence of acute and chronic heart failure, in particular failure of the right ventricle with hepatic congestion, can complicate the ICU course through induction of pulmonary shunting (i.e., HPS). This bi-directional cross talk of lung and liver can be viewed as a prominent example of organ–organ interactions that pave the way to multiple organ failure and death.
Supportive therapies with supplemental oxygen and liver transplantation remain the only therapies with proven benefit in cases of HPS associated with end-stage liver disease, and Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) exception can be granted to facilitate liver transplantation in various programs to reverse two potentially fatal organ dysfunctions []. Patients with HPS are at increased risk for prolonged mechanical ventilation with a longer ICU length of stay compared to other liver transplant recipients []. Most literature reports addressing management of these critical events reflect case reports or small case series, where inhaled vasodilators, most notably nitric oxide and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), have been applied as rescue strategies []. Albeit inhaled NO might selectively dilate well-aerated alveoli, the use of vasodilators in HPS in general remains controversial and should be restricted to short-acting NO in exceptional cases and as compassionate use.
Impaired clearance of vasoactive mediators by the failing liver plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of HPS, and the resulting right-to-left shunting, mismatch between ventilation and perfusion and impaired arterial oxygenation are generally reversible with recovery of hepatic function []. As a consequence, persistent severe hypoxemia and features of HPS despite improved liver function might reflect and should prompt search for concomitant anatomic shunting. However, in severe cases of HPS, remodeling of the pulmonary vasculature and reversal of shunting due to diffuse telangiectasia may take weeks or months. Pre-transplant risk assessment and classification of severity of HPS is mandatory, as patients with a paO2 < 60 mmHg not reversible to 100% oxygen may develop prolonged respiratory failure in the post-transplant period [].
In contrast, PoPH is a form of secondary pulmonary arterial hypertension occurring in only 2–8% of cirrhotic patients [] and, as in HPS, it can also be seen in patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. Presenting symptoms include dyspnea and fatigue and signs of increased workload of the right heart, such as elevated jugular venous pulse and tricuspid regurgitation. Other causes for PAH have to be ruled out and patients with PoPH require meticulous optimization of PAH-specific therapies prior to indication for LT. Treatment of PoPH includes inhaled or intravenous prostaglandins and agents such as sildenafil or bosentan, which are improved options to manage pulmonary hypertension and allow facilitating successful LT in this high-risk population. It is essential that the diagnosis of either arterial or venous pulmonary hypertension is identified and the latter may be successfully treated by addressing the volume status. Right heart catheterization is an essential component of assessment following echocardiography. Patients with PoPH have poorer survival when undergoing LT, but transplantation should be considered only in patients with mild PoPH or those responding to medical therapy with pulmonary vasodilators and MPAP < 35 mmHg []. In summary, pulmonary complications are important in well-defined subgroups of end-stage liver disease. These patients require meticulous assessment prior to listing and reflect high-risk patients in the peritransplant setting due to the development of right heart or weaning failure, respectively. Vice versa, deterioration of liver function and hypoxic hepatitis as a result of (right) heart failure can aggravate intrapulmonary shunting due to acutely developing HPS, an underestimated phenomenon in the general ICU population.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The cartoon in the figure was provided by Dr. M. Leitner from the Center for Sepsis Care & Control, University Hospital Jena, Germany.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Yang P, Formanek P, Scaglione S, Afshar M (2019) Risk factors and outcomes of acute respiratory distress syndrome in critically ill patients with cirrhosis. Hepatol Res 49(3):335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    O’Brien AJ, Welch CA, Singer M, Harrison DA (2012) Prevalence and outcome of cirrhosis patients admitted to UK intensive care: a comparison against dialysis-dependent chronic renal failure patients. Intensive Care Med 38(6):991–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fuhrmann V, Whitehouse T, Wendon J (2018) The ten tips to manage critically ill patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure. Intensive Care Med 44(11):1932–1935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Raevens S, Geerts A, Van Steenkiste C et al (2015) Hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension: recent knowledge in pathogenesis and overview of clinical assessment. Liver Int 35(6):1646–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wiest R, Albillos A, Trauner M et al (2017) Targeting the gut-liver axis in liver disease. J Hepatol 67(5):1084–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fuhrmann V, Krowka M (2018) Hepatopulmonary syndrome. J Hepatol 69(3):744–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krowka MJ, Wiesner RH, Heimbach JK (2013) Pulmonary contraindications, indications and MELD exceptions for liver transplantation: a contemporary view and look forward. J Hepatol 59(2):367–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Iyer VN, Swanson KL, Cartin-Ceba R, Dierkhising RA, Rosen CB, Heimbach JK, Wiesner RH, Krowka MJ (2013) Hepatopulmonary syndrome: favorable outcomes in the MELD exception era. Hepatology 57(6):2427–2435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fuhrmann V, Madl C, Mueller C, Holzinger U, Kitzberger R, Funk GC, Schenk P (2006) Hepatopulmonary syndrome in patients with hypoxic hepatitis. Gastroenterology 131(1):69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burra P, Burroughs A, Graziadei I et al (2016) EASL clinical practice guidelines: liver transplantation. J Hepatol 64:433–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krowka MJ, Fallon MB, Kawut SM et al (2016) International Liver Transplant Society Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension. Transplantation 100(7):1440–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schiffer E, Majno P, Mentha G et al (2006) Hepatopulmonary syndrome increases the postoperative mortality rate following liver transplantation: a prospective study in 90 patients. Am J Transplant 6(6):1430–1437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Santos J, Young P, Barjaktarevic I et al (2014) The successful use of inhaled nitric oxide in the management of severe hepatopulmonary syndrome after orthotopic liver transplantation. Case Rep Hepatol 2014:415109.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/415109Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sharma NS, Wille KM, Diaz Guzman E (2015) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after liver transplantation in a patient with hepatopulmonary syndrome and an atrial septal defect. Int J Artif Organs 38(3):170–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ashfaq M, Chinnakotla S, Rogers L, Ausloos K, Saadeh S, Klintmalm GB, Ramsay M, Davis GL (2007) The impact of treatment of portopulmonary hypertension on survival following liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 7(5):1258–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
When will less monitoring and diagnostic testing benefit the patient more?
The choosing wisely campaign has highlighted for each medical profession the five practices that both physicians and patients should question (http://www.choosingwisely.org/). Achieving informed test selection was named as one of the five challenges our profession should address in the years to come. However, the means of achieving this aim remains unclear. Some call for real-time disclosure of the costs and consequences of excessive testing. Others believe in better education on the topic. Both approaches are challenging, and neither is likely to suffice alone. There is also a need to change the medical system and societal expectations from a good doctor.
We perform many tests simply because we can and because we hesitate to change longstanding routines. We also overtest because we are concerned that we might miss an important finding that will ultimately affect patient survival []. However, excessive testing carries a heavy price. Over half of the intensive care unit (ICU) patients...
Prognostic relevance of serum lactate kinetics: a powerful predictor but not Chuck Norris in Intensive Care Medicine

References

  1. 1.
    Knapik P, Trejnowska E, Knapik M, Skoczyński S, Cyprys P, Cieśla D (2019) Prognostic relevance of serum lactate kinetics should be approached with caution. Intensive Care Med (in press)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Masyuk M, Wernly B, Lichtenauer M, Franz M, Kabisch B, Muessig JM, Zimmermann G, Lauten A, Schulze PC, Hoppe UC, Kelm M, Bakker J, Jung C (2019) Prognostic relevance of serum lactate kinetics in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 45(1):55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Revelly J-P, Tappy L, Martinez A, Bollmann M, Cayeux M-C, Berger MM, Chioléro RL (2005) Lactate and glucose metabolism in severe sepsis and cardiogenic shock. Crit Care Med 33(10):2235–2240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vincent J-L, Quintairos E Silva A, Couto L, Taccone FS (2016) The value of blood lactate kinetics in critically ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care 20(1):257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traumatic occipitoatlantal dissociation: high index of suspicion should be kept in mind

Reference

  1. 1.
    Mendenhall SK, Sivaganesan A, Mistry A, Sivasubramaniam P, McGirt MJ, Devin CJ (2015) Traumatic atlantooccipital dislocation: comprehensive assessment of mortality, neurologic improvement, and patient-reported outcomes at a level 1 trauma center over 15 years. Spine. 15:2385–2395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
High-flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: author's reply
Dear Editor,
Thanks to Dr. Luo and colleagues for their letter and comments []. In the protocol for our systematic review, we decided a priori that all analysis would be conducted using a random effects model, as this analytic plan better accounts for between-study differences []. In situations where statistical heterogeneity is minimal, the output from random effects models closely matches that of fixed effects models. However, in response to this letter, we did perform fixed effects analysis for this outcome and the pooled point estimate and 95% confidence intervals do not change.
We focused our TSA analysis on the outcomes most likely to be considered for future RCTs. As escalation of therapy is a composite, including outcomes of variable clinical and patient importance, we intentionally highlighted ‘need for IMV’ and ‘mortality’. For the TSA analysis, we had initially used the relative risk reductions from our pooled analysis to inform the sample size calculation. After peer review of the manuscript, we were asked to choose a threshold consistent with what we believed would be a clinically important difference. As such, we selected a 15% relative risk reduction for this dichotomous outcome.

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Luo MS, Huang GJ, Wu L (2019) High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05652-8Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rochwerg B, Granton D, Wang DX et al (2019) High flow nasal cannula compared with conventional oxygen therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 45(5):563–572.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05590-5 (published online first: Epub date)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Confirmation of brain death on VA-ECMO should mandate simultaneous distal arterial and post-oxygenator blood gas sampling

References

  1. 1.
    Bein T, Muller T, Citerio G (2019) Determination of brain death under extracorporeal life support. Intensive Care Med 45:364–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hoeper MM, Tudorache I, Kühn C et al (2014) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation watershed. Circulation 130:864–865.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.011677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society. The ANZICS statement on death and organ donation (edition 3.2). Melbourne: ANZICS; 2013. http://www.anzics.com.au/death-and-organ-donation. Accessed 1 Apr 2019
A patient with dermo-chondro-corneal dystrophy (François syndrome) and acute dyspnea

Emergency craniotomy in semi-lateral position for posterior fossa hemorrhage evacuation under venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Mechanical thrombectomy for a cerebral fat embolism
A 56-year-old patient underwent a right knee replacement under spinal anesthesia. At the end of the procedure, he suddenly developed right hemiplegia and aphasia. Emergent brain computed tomography (CT) revealed a left middle cerebral artery occlusion by material of negative density (− 33 Hounsfield Unit), highly suggestive of fat embolus (Fig. 1a). Indeed, this image differs from the typical hyperdense artery sign, which shows thrombus. Mechanical thrombectomy was successfully achieved by thrombo-aspiration (Fig. 1b) and retrieved spumous fat fragments (Fig. 1c). In this context of acute setting during orthopedic surgery, an intra-cardiac right-left shunt was searched during diagnostic work-up. Transesophageal echocardiography revealed a patent foramen ovale with an atrial septal aneurysm, supporting a paradoxical embolism of fat material released during surgery. The patient recovered well.
Fig. 1
a Injected cerebral computed tomography demonstrating left middle cerebral artery occlusion (left panel) due to a negative density embolus (− 33 Hounsfield Units, red arrowheads). b Pre- and post-aspiration angiographic runs showing arterial occlusion (top, black arrow) and complete revascularization of the left middle cerebral artery (bottom, black arrow). c Macroscopic aspect of the fat embolus after thrombectomy by direct intracranial aspiration
Brain CT remains the standard for acute neurological disorders because of its almost universal availability, and speed of acquisition, especially in the context of stroke, where every minute counts. In some cases, brain CT may also provide a pathognomonic clue of embolus constitution and help tailor revascularization strategy, i.e., the use of direct aspiration instead of a stentriever for a deemed friable fat embolus in this case.
A rare cause of laryngeal stenosis

Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:

Δημοσίευση σχολίου