Bearing the Pain: A Historic Review Exploring the Impact of Science and Culture on Pain Management for Childbirth in the United States
Scientific advances over the past 150 years have influenced pain management practices during childbirth. Cultural attitudes about pain in childbirth have also affected these practices. The objective of this work is to examine the history of pain management in childbirth in the United States and explore the relationship between cultural attitudes and care practices. A historic review was chosen as the research method. Included were records that described pain management practices and records that explored the relationship between care practices and American cultural attitudes about pain in childbirth. The health science reference databases of CINAHL (EBSCO host), PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for English language articles. There were no limitations in years searched. Twenty-five primary records and 42 secondary records met inclusion criteria and were used in this work. Scientific developments as well as ever-changing cultural attitudes have greatly impacted pain management practices for childbirth in America. A highly complex and parallel, relationship exists between science and culture in regards to this history. To promote positive birth experiences for women, it is essential that obstetrical practices are congruent with cultural views regarding appropriate pain management in childbirth.

From the Editors No abstract available

Perinatal Management of Group B Streptococcal Infection: Clinical Update No abstract available

Preventable Harm Reduction: A Balancing Act to Zero Harm No abstract available

Shared Decision-Making: A Model for Effective Communication and Patient Satisfaction No abstract available

The Rise and Coming of Age of the Electric Breast Pump No abstract available

The Influence of Social Media on Intrapartum Decision Making: A Scoping Review Social media has been influential in decision making regarding a number of health concerns. However, comparatively little has been examined with regard to its effects on pregnant women. The goal of this scoping review was to examine the literature and identify the role of social media in intrapartum decision making. A scoping review of the literature published between January 1990 and June 2018 was performed using PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. Of the initial 1951 records reviewed, 5 met inclusion criteria. Two of the 5 were quantitative in design, 1 was qualitative, and 2 used mixed methods. Internationally widespread, studies largely took place in developed nations including the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and Finland. Women are using the Internet, including social media, consistently as a source of pregnancy information, for example, 97% of 2400 participates in 1 exploratory study. This knowledge seeking was found to increase women's confidence and self-assurance in making decision during labor and birth. Studies identified issues surrounding women's ability to appraise available information. While it is clear that social media has an influence on women's intrapartum decision making, it is not clear exactly how. Further studies are needed to determine the content of the social media being appraised, the accuracy of the information, and the resulting decision as it affects the intrapartum experience. In addition, efforts should be made to open lines of communication between patients and care providers. This may foster a greater clinical understanding of social media consumption and its influences.

The Impact of Communication Surrounding Intrauterine Congenital Anomaly Diagnoses: An Integrative Review Congenital anomalies are the leading cause of infant death in the United States, accounting for 20% of the annual infant mortality. Advancements in ultrasound diagnostic technology allow practitioners to diagnose fetal anomalies as early as 11 weeks' gestational age, 75% of which are detected in low-risk pregnancies. Communicating a fetal anomaly diagnosis to parents and initiating perinatal end-of-life discussions are difficult for healthcare providers and parents alike. Furthermore, poorly communicated diagnoses have had long-term negative impacts on perinatal grief intensity, which can manifest into lifelong symptoms of adverse psychosocial outcomes such as anxiety, depression, substance abuse, and suicidal ideation. The purpose of this integrative review is to examine the impact of communication in discussing an intrauterine diagnosis of a fetal congenital anomaly on perinatal grief. An integrative review was conducted following the distinct 5-stage process of problem identification, searching the literature, evaluating data, analyzing, and presenting findings. A systematic literature review using the PICO model (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) and structured after the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). This framework was completed between November 2017 and May 2018 using PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases. Of the 931 article results, 15 satisfied search criteria. Emerging themes included parental need for appropriate time to assimilate and understand the diagnosis, freedom to explore options and alternatives, and the need for clinicians with expert communication skills. The initial conversation communicating the diagnosis of a congenital anomaly impacts expectant parents for the remainder of their lives. Healthcare professionals are in a unique position to either positively or negatively impact the intensity of perinatal grieving reactions. The application of empathetic, sensitive communication may offer solace and promote healing surrounding perinatal end-of-life discussions.

Healthcare Providers' Perceptions of Single-Room Versus Traditional Maternity Models: A Concurrent Mixed-Methods Study While many hospitals have transitioned from traditional maternity care to a single-room maternity model, little is known about how healthcare providers' practice differs between the models. This mixed-methods study compared healthcare providers' job satisfaction and team collaboration between traditional and single-room maternity care and explored how each model shaped providers' practice. Data were collected via questionnaires and interviews with healthcare providers from 2 hospitals. Independent t tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and thematic analysis were used in analysis; findings were then triangulated. No difference was found in team collaboration and job satisfaction scores between single-room (n = 84) and traditional (n = 42) maternity care; however, providers described different means toward satisfaction and collaboration in the interviews (n = 18). Single-room maternity care providers valued interprofessional teamwork, patient/family involvement, and continuity of care. Traditional maternity care providers enjoyed specialization but described teamwork as uniprofessional and disconnected across professions; transfers between units weakened communication and fragmented care. While single-room maternity care providers described less tension and a more holistic patient-family journey, further research must be undertaken to examine whether and how interprofessional collaboration and communication impact patient and health system outcomes.

Healthcare Providers' Perceptions of Single-Room Versus Traditional Maternity Models: A Concurrent Mixed-Methods Study No abstract available