Several issues on the article: patient-reported quality of life and pain after permissive weight bearing in surgically treated trauma patients with tibial plateau fractures: a retrospective cohort study

Analysis of complication after open coracoid transfer as a revision surgery for failed soft tissue stabilization in recurrent anterior shoulder instability Abstract Background The coracoid transfer represents a treatment option for patients with recurrent shoulder instability. Only a few studies exist about the complication rate of the coracoid transfer as a revision surgery following failed soft tissue stabilization. The purpose of this study was to analyze the results and complication rate after coracoid transfer as a revision surgery. Methods In this study 38 patients (4 females, 34 males, mean age 27 years) were included of whom 29 patients were available for follow-up after a mean of 27 months. Previous shoulder stabilization procedures were predominantly arthroscopic (n = 25). Complications were divided according to their timely appearance into early (< 3 months) and late (> 3 months) postoperatively as well as need for revision. Clinical scores [Constant Score (CS), Rowe Score (RS), Walch-Duplay-Score (WDS), WOSI and Subjective-Shoulder-Value (SSV)] were evaluated preoperatively and at final follow-up. Results In this patient cohort, the overall complication rate was 27.6%, all of them occurred > 3 months postoperatively. In seven of eight cases (24.1%) a repeat surgical procedure was conducted. Recurrent instability occurred in three patients (10.3%) of which two received a revision surgery (n = 1 iliac-crest bone graft, n = 1 labral repair). Due to persistent pain five patients underwent an arthroscopic implant removal. The complication rate was with 40% higher in patients with two or more previous surgeries (n = 4 out of 10 patients) compared to patients with one previous surgery (21%, n = 4 out of 19 patients). The scores increased significantly comparing pre- to postoperative [CS 74–90 points, RS 27–91 points, WDS 16–89 points, WOSI 40–76% and SSV 41–82% (p < 0.05)]. Conclusion The open coracoid transfer as a revision surgery after failed soft tissue stabilization leads to satisfying clinical results. However, the complication rate is high though comparable to data in the literature when used as a primary surgery. The indication for a coracoid transfer should be judged carefully and possible alternatives should be considered.

A whole leg radiograph is not necessary for postoperative determination of the mechanical leg axis after total knee arthroplasty Abstract Background Anteroposterior (AP) whole leg radiographs (WLR) in the standing position for assessment of the mechanical leg axis are generally performed preoperatively for the planning of total knee replacement (TKR) and postoperatively to assess the leg axis. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether, if preoperative WLR are available, postoperative AP standard knee radiographs in the standing position are sufficient for calculating the mechanical leg axis. Methods In the present prospective study, the mechanical and the anatomical leg axes were determined on the basis of WLR from 104 patients prior to implantation of a TKR and the difference was calculated. Twelve weeks postoperatively, standing long AP radiographs and WLR were prepared. In addition, the mechanical axis was calculated by adding the preoperative difference between the anatomical and mechanical axis to the anatomical axis from the postoperative AP radiographs. Accuracy, bias and level of agreement for calculated relative to measured mechanical alignment were determined. Results Mean accuracy of calculated mechanical alignment was 0.5° ± 0.4°, and mean bias was 0.0° ± 0.6° (p = 1.00). Bland–Altman analysis revealed a 95% upper and lower level of agreement of − 1.3° and 1.3°, respectively. Conclusion A preoperative WLR and a postoperative long AP knee standard radiograph are sufficient to determine the mechanical leg axis after TKR. If these are available, it is possible to do without WLR after TKR, particularly since they involve higher radiation exposure, are time-consuming, and are also prone to errors in the first postoperative weeks. Level of evidence II diagnostic study.

All-arthroscopic glenoid reconstruction by iliac crest bone graft transfer does not affect structural integrity and 3-dimensional volume of the subscapularis muscle Abstract Aim The subscapularis muscle is an important active stabilizer of the glenohumeral joint. For this radiological study, we investigated if its radiological integrity is affected after arthroscopic glenoid reconstruction. In the technique used, an autologous iliac crest graft is transported through the rotator interval, and the graft is fixed via an antero-inferior portal with compression screws. Methods 3 women and 6 men (mean age 31 ± 9 years, min 21, max 46 years) who had a preoperative glenoid deficit of 23% ± 6% (min 13%, max 29%) were included. In a follow-up after an interval of 34 months (min 19, max 50), MRI scans were performed on both shoulders. With ITK-SNAP, a 3D reconstruction software, the volume of the subscapularis muscle in the injured and contralateral shoulder was measured. In addition, signal intensity ratios (PSI) (infraspinatus muscle / cranial subscapularis muscle and infraspinatus muscle / caudal subscapularis muscle) were analyzed and the width of the cranial and caudal portions as well as the length of the subscapularis muscle in the parasagittal plane were determined. Results The 3D volume showed no difference between operated and healthy shoulders (p = 0.07), neither did PSI ratios (infraspinatus muscle / cranial subscapularis muscle: p = 1.00, infraspinatus muscle / caudal subscapularis muscle: p = 1.00). In the parasagittal plane, length (p = 0.09) and cranial width (p = 0.23) did not differ. However, the width of the lower muscle was increased in injured shoulders (p = 0.02). Conclusion In this cohort, no relevant volume loss could be found after arthroscopic glenoid reconstruction. However, a greater width of the lower muscle portion could be identified in the parasagittal plane as a possible indication of scarring.

The worst-case scenario: treatment of periprosthetic femoral fracture with coexistent periprosthetic infection—a prospective and consecutive clinical study Abstract Background The simultaneous occurrence of periprosthetic fracture (PPF) and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is among the most devastating complications in arthroplasty and carries the risk of limb loss. For the first time, this study will describe the characteristics, treatment concepts, and outcomes of this complication. Methods Patients were consecutively included who were treated at our specialized interdisciplinary department between 2015 and 2016 with a PJI and an additional PPF of the hip. The treatment algorithm followed a three-step procedure: the complete removal of any foreign material (step 1), fracture stabilization by plate, intramedullary rod osteosynthesis or cerclages using an additional spacer (step 2), and reimplantation of a new prosthesis (step 3). Results Overall, eight cases [four male, four female, mean age 77 years (55–91)] were included. The mean follow-up was 34 ± 8 months. The fractures included one PPF Vancouver B1, three B2/3, and four type C. Most frequent microbes were CNS (Coagulase-negative staphylococci) (n = 4), Cutibacterium (n = 2) and Staphylococcus aureus (n = 2). Mixed infections (≥ 2 microorganisms) occurred in five cases. The time between explanation and reimplantation was 42 ± 34 (range 7–123) days. A re-infection took place in one, a re-revision in four cases, and in five cases fracture healing was noticed. In all eight cases, freedom from the infection and limb preservation could be achieved. Conclusion PPF in the case of a PJI is a devastating situation and a huge challenge. Extremity preservation should be the primary goal. The described procedure offers a possible solution.

Space available for trans-sacral implants to treat fractures of the pelvis assessed by virtual implant positioning Abstract Introduction The use of trans-sacral implants to treat fractures of the sacrum is limited by the variable pelvic anatomy. We were interested in how many trans-sacral implants can be placed per pelvis? If a trans-sacral implant cannot be placed in S1, where is the cortex perforated, and is the use of sacroiliac screws safe in these pelves? Materials and methods 3D pelvic models were created from CT scans of 156 individuals without fractures (92 European and 64 Japanese, 79 male and 77 female, mean age 66.7 ± 13.7 years). Trans-sacral implants with a diameter of 7.3 mm were positioned virtually with and without a surrounding safe zone of 12 mm diameter. Results Fifty-one percent of pelves accommodated trans-sacral implants in S1 with a safe zone. Twenty-two percent did not offer enough space in S1 for an implant even when ignoring the safe zone. Every pelvis had sufficient space for a trans-sacral implant in S2, in 78% including a safe zone as well. In S1, implant perforation was observed in the sacral ala and iliac fossa in 69%, isolated iliac fossa perforation in 23% and perforation of the sacral ala in 8%. Bilateral sacroiliac screw placement was always possible in S1. Conclusions The use of trans-sacral implants in S1 requires meticulous preoperative planning to avoid injury of neurovascular structures. S2 more consistently offers space for trans-sacral implants.

Outcome of arthroscopy-assisted treatment for distal clavicle fractures Abstract Hypothesis The purpose of the present study was described as the arthroscopically assisted procedure that uses a synthetic conoid ligament reconstruction using Zip Tight (Zimmer biomet, Warsaw, USA) and fracture-site fixation with K-wire. Our hypothesis was that this technique provided a satisfactory functional outcome with minimum complication. Methods 45 patients underwent operation to treat fractures of the distal clavicle between January 2014 and May 2017. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) there is an episode of trauma and it is the first fracture (2) distal clavicle fracture of Neer type IIb with dislocation in image findings. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Neer type I, IIa and III of distal clavicle fracture (2) existing injury of rotator cuff, biceps tendon and labral during the arthroscopic procedure. Based on these criteria, 23 patients were included in this study. Clinical outcome assessments were performed using 1-year postoperative Quick DASH score, Constant–Murley score, ASES score. Radiological outcome consisted of antero-posterior and axillary radiographs. Results Mean clinical outcomes were as follows: Quick DASH score was 3.8 ± 2.8, ASES score was 92.3 ± 3.2 and Constant–Murley score was 94.1 ± 3.0. It was a highly satisfactory result in all of the score at 1-year follow-up. All patients had achieved radiographic union at a minimum 1-year follow-up. There were no cases of nonunion or osteolysis. Conclusions This study demonstrated that the arthroscopy-assisted treatment using Zip Tight and K-wire provided a satisfactory functional outcome with minimum complication with Neer type IIb fractures of the distal clavicle. Level of evidence IV, Case series, Treatment study.

Analysis of recurrence and complications after percutaneous needle fasciotomy in Dupuytren’s disease Abstract Introduction The partial aponeurectomy for treatment of Dupuytren’s contracture represents the gold standard for treatment of Dupuytren’s contracture. In selected cases, the alternative is the percutaneous needle fasciotomy (PNF). Materials and methods Between 2008 and 2018, 80 rays in 64 patients were treated using PNF. 53 patients (68 rays) were reviewed with a mean follow-up of 31 months. Results The recurrence rate was 18.9%. 49 patients with 62 rays had a totally free extension intra-operatively (92.4%). There were no complications. Only one patient reported a transient dysesthesia (1.8%) in the zone of operation. 86% of all patients would undergo the treatment again, if necessary. Patients were able to return to their job in an average of 5.5 days. Conclusions PNF is reliable and relatively simple to perform compared to partial aponeurectomy. Therefore, the PNF could be seen as a serious alternative for selected cases.

Denosumab treatment for giant-cell tumor of bone: a systematic review of the literature Abstract Background Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody (mAb) that specifically inhibits tumor-associated bone lysis through the RANKL pathway and has been used as neoadjuvant therapy for giant-cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in surgical as well as non-surgical cases. The purpose of this systematic review of the literature, therefore, is to investigate: (1) demographic characteristics of patients affected by GCTBs treated with denosumab and the clinical impact, as well as, possible complications associated with its use (2) oncological outcomes in terms of local recurrence rate (LRR) and development of lung metastasis, and (3) characteristics of its treatment effect in terms of clinical, radiological, and histological response. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and COCHRANE search including the following terms and Boolean operators: “Denosumab” AND “primary bone tumor”, “denosumab” AND “giant cell tumor”, “denosumab” AND “treatment”, and finally, “denosumab” AND “giant cell tumor” AND “treatment” since 2000. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 19 articles were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed using STROBE for the assessment of observational studies. Results A total of 1095 patients were included across all 19 studies. Across all the studies included, there were 615 females and 480 males. The mean patient age was 33.7 ± 8.3 years when starting the denosumab treatment. The pooled weighted local recurrence rate was 9% (95% CI 6–12%) and the pooled weighted metastases rate was 3% (95% CI 1–7%). The most common adverse event was fatigue and muscular pain. Radiologic response was estimated to occur in 66–100% of the patients. A significant reduction in pain under denosumab treatment was reported in seven studies and additional improvement in function and mobility was reported by several authors. Only two studies reported musculoskeletal tumor society (MSTS) scores which were better after denosumab treatment. Conclusions The use of denosumab as an adjuvant treatment of GCTB has shown a positive but variable histological response with consistent radiological changes and several types of adverse effects. There is a positive clinical response in terms of pain relief with decrease on the morbidity of surgical procedures to be performed. Finally, oncological outcomes are disparate with neither effect on metastatic disease nor local recurrence rates. Level of evidence IV.

Significance of orthopedic trauma specialists in trauma centers in Korea Abstract Introduction In 2012, the Korean central government selected trauma centers to provide effective treatment and reduce preventable mortality in severe trauma patients. General surgeons, thoracic surgeons, orthopedists, and neurosurgeons play pivotal roles in trauma centers, as most trauma patients require orthopedic procedures. This study aimed to underscore the importance of trauma orthopedic specialists (TOSs) by comparing treatment outcomes between a TOS and general orthopedists. Patients and methods Orthopedic trauma patients with injury severity scores > 15 points, admitted to level 1 trauma centers between March 2015 and December 2016, were divided into the TOS group (treated by 1 orthopedic trauma specialist who treats trauma patients with no limitation in the joint of specialization) and the general orthopedist group (GOG; treated by several general orthopedists who manage both trauma and disease but are each specialized in a certain joint). Emergency room response time, triage time, surgical preparation time, number of surgeries per patient, intensive care unit (ICU) duration, complications, and mortality were retrospectively analyzed. Results Among 272 patients, 52 were treated by a TOS and 220 were treated by several general orthopedists. For the TOS group and the GOG, the average emergency room response time was 8 and 32 min; average triage time, 27 and 162 min; average surgical preparation time, 141 and 350 min; average number of surgeries per patient, 1.9 and 2.7; and average ICU duration, 8.5 and 12.2 days, respectively. The TOS group saved $2700 per patient. No statistical differences were found in complications and mortality between the 2 groups. Conclusions TOSs can provide rapid treatment to trauma patients and systemically participate in collaborative treatment with other specialists in a trauma center. As treatment provided by a TOS can also reduce the ICU duration, TOSs can play an important role in rapid rehabilitation and cost reduction for trauma patients.